Conduct an independent review of an assessment appeal
You are an Independent Reviewing Assessor assigned by Compliance and Quality.
What has happened
Deng Malual, an enterprise trainer at Merriwa Holdings, received a not yet competent result in the assessment cluster and lodged an appeal on the grounds that his workplace evidence portfolio was not considered. The appeal is acknowledged in the complaints and appeals register with an outcome due by 4 October. You were not involved in the original decision. The original assessor's records, the tool version used, the marking guide and Deng's portfolio are available. Deng has asked to meet with a support person present. The Compliance and Quality Manager wants a written outcome with reasons that would withstand external review.
Deliverables
- Independent review record with evidence analysis
- Written appeal outcome with reasons
- Updated complaints and appeals register and student register entries
- Improvement note if applicable
Documents to use
- Complaints and Appeals Policy Policy
- Assessment Conduct Procedure Procedure
- Assessment Appeal Form Form
- Continuous Improvement Plan Plan
Systems to use
Complaints and Appeals Register
Logs every complaint and appeal from receipt to outcome, with the independent owner, due dates and improvement actions.
Student Management Register
Holds every learner's enrolment, identifier verification, support plan, progress and result records.
Assessment Validation Schedule
Schedules and records validation sessions, samples, outcomes and corrective actions for every unit on scope.
Units of competency
Current on training.gov.au for the Training and Education Training Package as at 10 September 2026.
TAEASS412Assess competenceTAEASS511Lead assessmentTAETAS411Maintain training and assessment informationTAEPDD401Work effectively in the VET sectorQualifications
TAE40122Certificate IV in Training and AssessmentTAE50122Diploma of Vocational Education and TrainingWhat to look for
Evidence guide
The review must be evidence based and independent, with a clear statement of which requirements the portfolio does or does not satisfy. The meeting must show natural justice: listening, clarifying and not pre-judging. The written outcome must give reasons a lay reader can follow and state external review rights. Register updates must be timely and accurate.